Genes that contribute to obtaining a higher education are weeded out by natural selection. Without intellectually developed people, it is impossible to maintain a technically complex economy. What is to be done?

анонимный вопрос

In the article you refer to, Alexander Markov already provides an answer to the question of what needs to be done. I quote:

…it makes sense to think about the development of high-tech, efficient, and humane methods for correcting unfavorable evolutionary trends. This includes methods related to genetic engineering, gene therapy, and the selection of gametes or early embryos.

By the way, these are exactly the methods I fantasized about when discussing ways to get rid of pathological aggression.

It remains to be understood how ancap can help in the development of the aforementioned methods. And here the answer is quite obvious. The main thing holding back the development of human genome correction methods today is government bans. No state — no bans.

But ancap is not just the abolition of the bioethics factor that puts a spoke in the wheels of progress. It is also the abolition of social taxes that the middle class pays for child benefits for the lumpen. In the absence of forced redistribution, the rich and educated have more economic incentives to have children, and the poor and uneducated have fewer.

Finally, in the absence of a mandatory state educational standard, people will not need to spend time studying various garbage subjects, such as patriotism lessons. Fewer costs for education (whether measured in time or money) means more is freed up for children.

Thus, in a stateless capitalist society, several factors emerge that weaken the effect mentioned in the article, and in the long run, abolish it entirely. There you have it, gentlemen proponents of racial superiority, an additional argument for ancap.