Evolution of democracies in two case studies

The elections for the Electoral College in the USA were quite dirty, and whatever decision the electors eventually make regarding the presidential candidacy, its legitimacy will be highly questionable.

In the LPR, the division into two independent parties has finally taken shape. Both held their conventions, elected governing bodies, adjusted their charter documents—and intend to compete for people wishing to join a libertarian party.

The LPR is a benchmark for the US governance system. Just as it was in the LPR until very recently, the USA is split roughly in half, which means that each side is forced to spend disproportionate effort imposing its agenda on the other side, while the latter merely waits for the right moment to undo it all after the next elections. Several billion dollars were spent on the US elections; this would have been enough to reorganize a single dysfunctional government into a system of two contractual jurisdictions, each of which could freely compete for taxpayers.

In the LPR, there are regional branches that have almost entirely moved to one of the party forks, and there are swing states where two fully functional branches eventually formed. A similar outcome should occur in the USA: large cities will almost entirely move toward the dem-fork, the heartland toward the rep-fork, and in some places, there will be enough of a checkerboard pattern that changing jurisdiction won’t even require moving to the next block, because representatives of both are located in the same block.

I want to wish the USA not to stop at the achieved division but to continue deepening it without descending into civil war. I want to wish the LPR rapid development spurred by competition. I want to wish the readers to see the seeds of a beautiful future in what is happening, rather than the sunset of civilization.

Leave a Reply