The End of Minarchism in Switzerland

Bitarch’s Column

Adeptes of minarchism often cite Switzerland as an example of a successfully functioning minimal state that we should all strive for. They consider the confederal structure to be a guarantee against the expansion of government powers. In reality, however, there is a creeping growth of the state with signs of acceleration in recent decades. For example, a law prohibiting the criticism of homosexuality was recently passed, de facto destroying freedom of speech—the foundation of a free society. This puts a final end to the belief in the possibility of the sustainable existence of a minimal state.

A territorial monopoly will always strive for growth, and no measures are capable of restraining it. Only competition for people can reverse this trend. Even if you consider anarcho-capitalism a utopia at the moment, proposing minarchism as a transitional model is even more utopian! Do not waste your time; instead, pay attention to the model of extra-territorial contractual jurisdictions (ETC, panarchy).

A woman with a painted face underneath a rainbow umbrella

Isn’t Switzerland the best example of successful minarchism?

anonymous question

Switzerland is the best example of a successful confederation, the successful operation of direct democracy, and the successful opposition to the expansion of state functions. However, even Switzerland is still not minarchism. Taxes instead of voluntary contributions, the existence of a central bank, and state economic and non-economic regulations are all beyond the minarchist ideal.

Nevertheless, Switzerland is an excellent benchmark for virtually any modern society desiring more freedom and less state.