Anonymous question

What are you even talking about? That which government officials are meant to manage is not property at all. It is simply a no-man’s-land resource. Soviet people, who invented the formula “you are the master here, not a guest—take every nail from work,” understood better than anyone what “state-owned” meant. By the way, it was precisely this tactic toward the state that led to its end; it was literally dismantled nail by nail, and only after that did people acquire a certain amount of property that was previously inaccessible to them.

So, graffiti on no-man’s-land walls is simply decorating the space around oneself at one’s own expense.

P.S. Following the discussion of the answer, I will add: graffiti on a government institution is not an attack on property (a government institution is not owned), but it is an attack on the privilege of government officials to have absolute control over the building’s walls.