In particular, about freedom, property, voluntary interaction, and the boundaries of individual autonomy

https://rt.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph6075cd75089c4

Nihilist (the question is accompanied by a donation of 0.00012 BTC)

The question has puzzled me quite a bit, but what can you do. The money has been paid – I have to answer.

In the video, an OnlyFans model plays a dominance game with her partner: she straps him to the bed, straddles him, and forces him to cum inside her, while he breaks down like a girl, saying something like, “Can you do it without creampieing? I’m not in the mood today.”

In these times, the situation is completely ordinary. Generated videos have not yet displaced live filming. Marriage and children in no way interfere with self-expression on OnlyFans, especially since they are behind the scenes. Simple role-playing in bed is a common seasoning for sex, especially if it is for an audience.

In short, what we have before us in no way violates libertarian principles, nor mainstream liberal norms. In Montenegro, I crossed paths three times with girls who worked in the adult-content industry: one at the beach, another during a medical exam, and a third also worked as a DJ. They did not hide their occupation, were not ashamed at all, and in the companies they hung out with, it wasn’t a sensation at all. Just another type of remote work. If people were interested in anything regarding their work, it was how much it cost to provide themselves with a sufficiently wide and stable outgoing internet channel. I cannot rule out that men perceived their occupation with somewhat more caution; it’s hard for me to judge here. At least, I happened to overhear the indignation of some guy whose acquaintance offered him to work as a second person in the frame, and he’d rather die than do such a thing—he was just hitting on her purely and selflessly, and was, of course, stunned that he was perceived more as a candidate for business partners than as a romantic suitor.

Nearly a third of Alex Rozov’s book volume is a condemnation of various forms of puritanism, and while reading them, I have always found it unclear where he gets so many puritans from and why he devotes so much attention to them; it would be just like if I started angrily condemning some form of classical Marxism in every second post—an obviously marginal ideology at the moment, whose peak of influence has long since passed. In short, no matter how you look at it, it is unclear what is so special about this video that it warrants discussion.

However, we can view it specifically as a short fiction film. In that case, we are interested not in the actress herself, but in the act of her character, who chained a man to a bed to forcibly conceive a child from him. In this case, indeed, the act itself becomes a violation of the non-aggression principle, and most likely, it is a prologue to an even greater violation of the non-aggression principle. The most probable motive for such an unusual offense is the desire to secure alimony (otherwise, there are no problems with obtaining consent, and thus no coercion is required; for example, I had no problems finding the father of my child). In this scenario, the man must be wealthy enough that such an adventure makes sense for the sake of alimony, and harmless enough that scenarios of coercing him to abandon his criminal intent are not taken seriously. Well, in that case, what we have before us is an illustration of a criminal conspiracy between a petty extortionist and a serious gang. In fact, it is the same scenario as a classic robbery, in which a small boy first appears on the scene, provokes the victim into rudeness, and that is when the muscle appears to collect for the rudeness. Is it worth taking offense at the boy in this scenario? It is clear that the main problem lies with the gang. It is the same with alimony—the problem lies with the state.

Of course, this does not mean that if there were no gangs, everyone would bully the little boys, or that if there were no state, there would be no one to care for the unfortunate woman left alone with a child in her arms while the father vanished into the sunset. It simply means that the process of resolving such situations would become far more varied than the typical statist scenario of appealing to the toughest bully in the neighborhood.

These are, perhaps, the philosophical considerations that this mediocre pornographic video is capable of prompting in me.