A week ago, I mentioned three events where the state took repressive actions and people responded to them in various ways. All three storylines have since had developments.
The second fork of the Libertarian Party of Russia has also been recognized as a foreign agent organization
Now no one feels slighted that the state notices his party while ignoring the rivals’ party; both got a taste of the medicine. In response, both parties announced a total freeze of their activities. This is more than logical, because writing “bullshit” in every headline is quite humiliating, and there is no point in enduring this humiliation, as a foreign agent organization is prohibited from engaging in educational activities and participating in politics—which is exactly what both LPRs have done throughout their history.
A side plot has also seen some development. Montelibero reminded us of the support program for repatriates to Montenegro, and the Montenegrin state, in turn, reminded us that it is actively striving for the EU, harmonizing its visa policy with the European Union, and therefore introducing a visa regime with the RF starting in November. Finita, a popular relocation destination is closing. What is the point of getting a Montenegrin visa if the requirements will be Schengen-like; wouldn’t it be better to just get a Schengen visa and at least have the opportunity to choose one of 27 countries for residence.
The popular Ukrainian Minister of Defense was not reinstated, but instead, the commander-in-chief was replaced by a more popular one
This is, of course, the strangest development of the plot, because it moves in complete contradiction to the official rhetoric. The President of Ukraine claimed that he had no complaints against the former Minister of Defense, but simply a conflict between him and the commander-in-chief. And so, the commander-in-chief was removed; it would seem the problem was solved. But no, in fact, the firing of the Minister of Defense was the goal of all the reshuffles. The retired minister is asserting his rights, the street continues to protest, and the democratic process—being by definition a euphemism for civil war—is working at full blast in exactly this, its primary capacity; if it worked like this for everyone, there would be significantly fewer complaints about democracy.
Balaji Srinivasan’s Network State has signed a partnership agreement with Kazakhstan, and he’s getting the hell out of Malaysia
Thus, the founder of the Network State not only carried out his threat to move capital out of a toxic jurisdiction but was also welcomed with open arms in another jurisdiction, and this is exactly what the concept of the network state was devised for: the possibility of obtaining diplomatic recognition from traditional territorial states.
The subject of the Network State’s conflict with Malaysia, if Twitter comments are to be believed, is quite ridiculous in itself. The Malaysian police literally stormed their campus not just for no reason, but were looking for Jews under the floor, which makes the plot completely Tarantino-esque.
General conclusions and forecasts
Traditional territorial states care less and less about their own systemic well-being and more and more about serving the momentary whims of top officials or long-neglected bureaucratic processes whose meaning has long been lost. The sanctity of state decisions has been lost almost everywhere; now legitimacy is being actively spent. When legitimacy drops sufficiently, the sabotage of state decisions will become a widespread and quite ordinary phenomenon. It seems, however, that the collapse of state management systems will remain fairly peaceful: where the state is aggressive, individuals and organizations avoid violent conflict with it, but the conflict still undermines the state’s strength.










































